Across several weeks, coercive communications continued. Initially, supposedly from an ex-law enforcement official and an ex-military commander, later from the authorities. Ultimately, a local artisan asserts he was summoned to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.
The leather artisan is among those resisting a multimillion-dollar initiative where Dharavi – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – faces demolished and transformed by a large business group.
"The distinctive community of this area is unparalleled in the world," states Shaikh. "However the plan aims to dismantle our way of life and silence our voices."
The narrow alleys of Dharavi sit in stark contrast to the towering buildings and Bollywood penthouses that overshadow the area. Residences are assembled randomly and typically without proper sanitation, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is filled with the overpowering odor of open sewers.
For certain residents, the promise of a renewed Dharavi into a glistening neighborhood of luxury high-rises, neat parks, modern retail complexes and residences with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream come true.
"There's no adequate medical facilities, paved pathways or sewage systems and there's nowhere for youth to recreate," states A Selvin Nadar, fifty-six, who moved from southern India in the early eighties. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and construct proper housing."
But others, including the leather artisan, are fighting against the project.
Everyone acknowledges that Dharavi, consistently overlooked as an illegal encroachment, is desperately requiring financial support and improvement. But they are concerned that this initiative – lacking resident participation – is one that will transform a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into a luxury development, displacing the disadvantaged, immigrant populations who have resided there since the late 1800s.
These were these shunned, displaced people who established the vacant wetlands into an extensively researched phenomenon of self-reliance and commercial output, whose economic value is valued at between a significant amount and a substantial sum per year, making it a major unregulated sectors.
Of the roughly one million people living in the crowded sprawling area, less than 50% will be qualified for alternative accommodation in the project, which is expected to take an extended timeframe to accomplish. Additional residents will be relocated to barren areas and saline fields on the distant periphery of the city, potentially fragment a historic social network. Some will be denied housing at all.
Those allowed to stay in the neighborhood will be given flats in high-rise buildings, a major break from the evolved, communal way of dwelling and laboring that has supported this area for many years.
Commercial activities from tailoring to ceramic crafts and material recovery are expected to decrease in quantity and be moved to a specific "business area" far from homes.
For those such as the leather artisan, a workshop owner and multi-generational of his family to reside in the slum, the plan presents an existential threat. His rickety, three-floor facility makes garments – tailored coats, premium outerwear, decorated jackets – marketed in high-end shops in the city's affluent areas and overseas.
Household members dwells in the accommodations underneath and his workers and tailors – workers from different regions – also sleep on-site, enabling him to sustain operations. Beyond Dharavi's enclave, Mumbai rents are often 10 times costlier for a single room.
At the government offices in the vicinity, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project illustrates a contrasting vision for the future. Well-groomed people gather on two-wheelers and electric vehicles, acquiring international bread and pastries and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area near a coffee shop and dessert parlor. It is a world away from the affordable idli sambar breakfast and 5-rupee chai that sustains the neighborhood.
"This is not progress for our community," says Shaikh. "It represents a massive real estate deal that will price people out for residents to remain."
Additionally, there exists concern of the development company. Run by a powerful tycoon – among the country's wealthiest and a close ally of the government head – the conglomerate has faced accusations of preferential treatment and financial impropriety, which it disputes.
Although the state government labels it a joint project, the developer contributed a significant amount for its controlling interest. A case stating that the redevelopment was questionably assigned to the corporation is pending in India's supreme court.
Since they began to vocally oppose the redevelopment, protesters and community members state they have been faced ongoing efforts of harassment and intimidation – including messages, explicit warnings and suggestions that criticizing the initiative was comparable with anti-national sentiment – by people they claim are associated with the developer.
Among those suspected of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c